The Catcher in the Rye

In high school, I avoided reading most of the literature we were assigned.  I found a lot of it dull (somehow, I found MacBeth to be rather interesting) and the discussions we had in class about the books even duller.  Without spending a single cent on CliffsNotes (easily half of the high school used the study guides as replacements for doing the actual reading assignmetns), I managed As in my English classes and passed the AP exam, which helped me avoid having to take English classes in college.  Oddly, when I deiced studying Russian in addition to computer science was a good idea in college, I took a Russian literature (the books were English translations, though) class.  I remember that the non-AP English class had to read the Grapes of Wrath my senior year.  That sounded horrible, and I was glad I didn’t have to do that.

I am not sure if the Catcher in the Rye by J. D. Salinger (ISBN: 978-0-316-76917-4) was assigned reading for the regular English class, but it certainly wasn’t for the AP English class, so I never had to read it in high school.  The main character in the book, Holden Caulfield, though, is in high school (well, technically, he’s just been expelled from yet another fancy boarding school), and is struggling with much of what teenagers often contend with, such as a fear of growing up, struggles with making or keeping friends, troubles with figuring out one’s identity, and depression.  The main character is the narrator of the story, which is really just a his train-of-consciousness re-telling of about three days of his life, starting with his having been kicked out of school right before Christmas break, and how he deals with that.  He introduces the reader to some of his teachers, his roommates and dormmates, his sister, a friend from back home, and a few other people he runs into as he tries to avoid going home before he’s supposed to show up at home for Christmas break.  He expresses a lot of negativity for the world and for the people he has contact with, usually because they come across to him as fake.  His rare moments of joy come from his little sister and from other little kids he runs into since they are still innocent and present to the world just who they are, not trying to hide anything or be something they’re not.  He tells his sister that his dream job would be to be a “catcher in the rye,” saving kids running in a rye field toward a cliff from falling off the edge, which is a metaphor for helping people preserve their innocence and lack of “phoniness” (one of his favorite words).

The book was an interesting one, although I would say I had to really push through the first third or so before I felt like had any sense at all of what this kid was about.  His rich, privileged background, combined with his emo outlook and New York street-tough bravado was foreign, complex, and rather off-putting.  Another reason I felt like the book was a slog at times was the insane amount of profane language, easily a dozen profanities per page.  There was also a healthy dose of vulgarity thrown in.  Were this a book a movie script in the 1980s or early 1990s, it would’ve got an R rating.  These days, it probably pulls off a PG-13.  There was also a lot of substance abuse and a handful of sexual references as well as other suggestive scenes.  All of this made me wonder why this book is so commonly assigned in high schools.  The protagonist is a high schooler, but Salinger himself noted that he wrote the novel for an adult audience, and the content is definitely only, as they say, “for mature audiences only.”  I thought the themes explored in the book were interesting, and were things, especially the one about phoniness, even I, now far removed from my teenage years, could relate to in one way or another, and I understand the kind of character the author wanted to portray, but I thought the final product was over the top and detracted from the message of the story.  Remembering my impressionable teenage years, it would’ve been very distracting, and I’m glad I wasn’t exposed to it then.

This work, including all text, photographs, and other original work, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License and is copyrighted © MMXXI John Pruess.

Tower of Secrets

I’m not a big movie watcher, so I’ve never seen a Bond movie and pulp fiction rarely interests me (admittedly, I’ve read the original Bourne books — and liked them better than the movies, of course), but I know that bad-guy Russians, usually affiliated with the KGB play a role in at least some of those movies and a lot of fictional spy thrillers.  It, of course, fits well with the Cold War that wasn’t so much a motif through the 1980s, but real life.  It’s an easy way to capture people’s imaginations and draw them into a story.  What has always been even more intriguing than those stories, though, is real life.  I remember Cuban and Eastern European athletes defecting during international competitions and thought that was brave of them.  Movies like Night Crossing regular people defecting had an even larger impact on me.  These people knew the value of freedom and were willing to risk their lives for it.

Tower of Secrets: A Real Life Spy Thriller by Victor Sheymov (ISBN: 978-0-9858930-4-0) is a story more in line with stories of regular people defecting than athletes, but Sheymov wasn’t exactly a regular guy.  He was an officer in one of the Soviet security agencies, the same KGB that was the subject of so much Western fiction.  The KGB he describes in the book often sounds much more like what one imagines working in the IRS or some other boring bureaucratic organization would be like, but he also talks about the things the KGB is more famous for.  Sheymov described his life abroad as an employee of the Soviet Union, working to protect the Soviets’ state secrets and he described his life at home in the Soviet Union.  I found both of them to be rather interesting portrayals of life.  He tells of both the good and the bad, lending an air of credibility to the work.  Eventually, Sheymov and his wife start to question the system they live in.  This is especially shocking to Sheymov himself because he works as part of the system and some of his initial resistance to going against that system is the result of the privilege it has afforded him and his family.  Finally, though, they come to the realization that whatever positives they get from the communist system don’t outweigh the negatives for themselves, their daughter, and for people around them.  The USSR was pretty locked down, though, especially for someone working for the government.  Sheymov and his wife cooked up a plan to get out, but had to make contact with a Western intelligence agency to make that work.  He chose the Americans and ran a risky operation by himself while on a business trip to Poland, where he disguised himself, hopped out a bathroom window, walked into the American embassy, and then returned to his comrades.  Sometime later, more disguises, a train journey, riding in a car with false spaces under the back seats, and smugglers all played a role in getting the Sheymovs to the West.

I enjoyed reading the book.  I found a few similarities to Next Stop Execution: some good descriptions of everyday Soviet life that grounded the book and made it interesting for those of us who weren’t there and some of the discussions about working for what was the world’s most feared intelligence service were neat to read.  I also found the authors’ egoism to be similar.  This book also suffers from being self-published, so there are more than a handful of typos, which can be kind of distracting.  The story of getting that first contact with the Americans set up and then the plan to get the Sheymovs out of the USSR, though, was gripping stuff and well worth the read.  Just like the book’s subtitle promises, it was just like a good story and less like a memoir.  Sheymov’s discussion of his ideological change was also very interesting and it involved various aspects of life.  He accurately noted that communism promised security and justice, but did so at a great price: freedom, both economic and intellectual.  He also grappled with the knowledge that communism has killed many thousands of people, oddly, in the name of equality.  Socialism, in the end, is built for preventing others from succeeding instead of helping people achieve.  These accurate criticisms of socialism and communism are extremely relevant today and serve as the most powerful of Sheymov’s fun and educational book.

   

This work, including all text, photographs, and other original work, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 License and is copyrighted © MMXIV John Pruess.

Книга Мормона

This year, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints used the Book of Mormon as the text, in conjunction with the relatively new Come, Follow Me manual, for Sunday school lessons.  The Book of Mormon has always been a part of my life since I’m a life-long member of the Church, and I have come to know that it never hurts to re-read this book, which is aptly described by its subtitle, “Another Testament of Jesus Christ.”  Since it’s been almost twenty years since I finished by mission, which I served in St. Petersburg, Russia, I thought it would be fitting to read the Russian translation of the book.  It’s gone through a few updates since I read it as a missionary, so there would be a little bit of a new feel to it for me (my version was dated March 24th, 2015).

 
While I normally try to summarize the book or provide highlights and some of the author’s main points, that seemed a little less useful for a book of scripture, but since part of the impetus behind reading it in Russian was to help maintain (re-gain?) at least a semblance of Russian-language skills, I thought I would hearken back to my mission days and try to give the same type of overview of the Книга Мормона that we gave as missionaries when doing what we called street contacting, simply walking up to people, asking if they’d give us a few minutes of their time, and then explaining who we were and what, in generic terms, our message was.  If people were willing to listen for a few minutes, we usually had a chance to talk about the Book of Mormon, which was new and unique for upwards of 90% of the people with whom we spoke.  Most missionaries, myself included, liked to use the illustrations included at the front of the book.  We typically told people we met that the Book of Mormon was a book of scripture, the same as the Bible is a book of scripture, that testified of Jesus Christ.  It was written by ancient prophets, starting with a man named Lehi, who left Jerusalem and moved to the American continent.  The book recorded the history and prophecies of Lehi’s descendants, culminating in a visit to these people by the resurrected Savior, where He taught His gospel and performed miracles just as He had done in Jerusalem.  This record was compiled by another ancient prophet, named Mormon, and buried, later to come forth, with God’s help, through a modern-day prophet named Joseph Smith.  The book ends with a promise that if we ask God about its truthfulness, He will answer us.

I will first note that I am a huge fan of how this edition of the Book of Mormon in Russian uses the Russian letter Ё (yo).  While most literate Russians don’t need it printed, and there’s some debate among linguists about its status, learners of Russian are helped immensely by the letter.  I would’ve loved having it in the Book of Mormon as a missionary (as it was, I always added the two dots over the E when it was required by hand in my copy as a missionary).  The new translation, though, didn’t always leave me as satisfied.  I found that they strayed from some Biblical phrasings or other more staid expressions in favor of more literal translations (which has been done with other languages, too), likely in an attempt to make the scriptures more accessible to the modern, younger reader.  Finally, there were a few translations, as usual, where having a native English speaker who knows Russian well as a proofreader would’ve helped.  None of those imperfections reduce the truth of the book, of course.  As stated above, it’s never bad to re-read the Book of Mormon.  Even though I know very well how the stories go and what the main lessons are, the book is inspiring almost every time I pick it up.  Like the Bible, the Book of Mormon is full of eternal truths and principles that apply to our lives even though the situations we encounter are continually changing and the world around us is always fluid.  At the end of the book, Moroni’s promise continues to deliver.  Moroni notes that we can know the truth of all things through the Holy Ghost, and I have put that to the test repeatedly, both about the Book of Mormon and about other Church- and doctrine-related questions.  My belief in God, in the scriptures, and in the Church have repeatedly been strengthened, often as a result of my questions, and I can state, just as I did twenty years ago at the end of the quick overview given to so many people on the streets of St. Petersburg, I know the Book of Mormon is the word of God!

   

This work, including all text, photographs, and other original work, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 License and is copyrighted © MMXIV John Pruess.

Democracy in America

I have always appreciated what America’s Founders did.  George Washington, Samuel Adams, Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, Patrick Henry, Nathan Hale, and others were childhood heroes of mine (and remain so today).  They were people that sacrificed much, in some cases their lives, for liberty.  They did so with a lot of uncertainty swirling around them.  They knew they were fighting for the right thing, freedom, but there were so many questions about whether or not the revolution would be won, then whether or not their new country would survive, and whether or not the untried system of government they set up in the U.S. Constitution would work or not.  Would such a government be able to protect the rights of its citizenry?  In other countries, many were anxiously watching to see how the American experiment would turn out.  Many in Great Britain hoped it would fail.  Others watched with hope or out of curiosity.

Democracy in America by Alexis de Tocqueville (ISBN: 978-0-553-21464-2) are the results of the aristocrat’s observations of the fledgling United States.  He and a companion were assigned by the French government to learn about the prison system in the U.S., which they did, but de Tocqueville came home with extensive notes on all aspects of life in America and wrote about the unique American take on democracy, a subject that was always of interest to de Tocqueville.  The book consists of two volumes and does, in fact, cover just about every aspect of American life.  The author’s discussion includes the following non-exhaustive list of topics: socio-economic upward mobility, sense of community, belief in God, history of the American Indians (especially interesting to members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints since de Tocqueville’s sources point to all the Indian languages coming from one source), the arm of Providence in the American founding, religion as the foundation of morality, the importance of a judiciary that can be recalled (impeached), the inability of a central power (government) to control every aspect of its citizenry’s lives, centralization’s tendency to promote stagnation, government’s purpose being to secure the welfare of the people and not to establish order and regularity, executive authority’s tendency to abuse power, the negatives of re-elecction being a possibility for politicians, the importance of sound men being appointed to the Supreme Court because of the court’s inherent power, the dangers of political parties (de Tocqueville shared this observation with many of America’s Founders), freedom of the press working best when the media is characterized by a wide variety in sources, the role of individualism and how politics work best when one does not look to the government for solutions of one’s problems, government is a necessary evil, laws’ tendency to prevent wealth, the importance of a strong middle class, lawyers’ negative impact on society, how when one loses one’s religion, one tends to try to take it from others, the pursuit of happiness, the importance of common foundations for society and community to exist, and the relative importance of freedom relative to the opinion of others. 

This book is often touted as being must-read stuff for political scientists, historians, and those interested in early American politics or history.  It lived up to its billing and, in my view, more.  This edition that I read is a mass-market paperback, so tiny print and over 1,000 pages.  It never felt like slogging through even with the old-fashioned language and heavy subject matter.  The book was fascinating.  I made a dozen pages of notes with quotations from the book.  As mentioned above, it touched on just about every aspect of American political life and made a few trips off to the side to talk about some of the social aspects of America, too.  What was particularly interesting was the book’s relevance to today.  The Founders live large in American life not only because they founded a country, but because that country remains today, having withstood almost 250 years, which isn’t too bad for an experiment.  It helps that the experiment was divinely inspired, but it’s not too shabby, nonetheless.  The book’s relevance is heightened because of the adroit commentary provided by de Tocqueville.  It’s not just observations, but also analysis.  I noticed that I didn’t always agree with the analysis provided, but I usually did.  De Tocqueville’s analysis more often than not seemed to agree with a more traditional American approach to government: small, local, by and for the people, and based on a belief in God.  Maybe it was easier for him to see since he wasn’t an American and had less of a stake in it, but de Tocqueville noted on a few occasions in the book that he thought much of the American governmental experiment would be wise to apply elsewhere, even in spite of his self-described Leftist beliefs.  We today would be wise to heed such advice.

This work, including all text, photographs, and other original work, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 License and is copyrighted © MMXIV John Pruess.

Just Mercy

I don’t remember when I first heard about modern executions, but at some point as a kid, probably around ten years old, I remember a prisoner on death row in Utah being executed.  It was all over the news because, as I recall, there were protests against the death penalty.  I remember seeing crowds lined up around the fence of the prison with signs and everything.  The death penalty has been around since the beginning of time, so I have always been interested in the arguments some people make against it.  Easily the most compelling is that of wrongful conviction.  Widely accepted studies claim that between 1 and 5% of all trials result in wrongful conviction, which seems unfair, especially if one of those wrongful convictions leads to the death penalty.

Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption by Bryan Stevenson (ISBN: 978-0-8129-8496-5) tells the story of the author’s lifelong crusade to provide justice for people whom he believes were treated unfairly by the courts in America.  The reader gets a brief history of Stevenson’s life before founding his non-profit law project, the Equal Justice Initiative (EJI), and then a detailed look at the case of Walter McMillian, a man who was wrongfully accused (let along wrongfully convicted).  Along the way, Stevenson provides a few details of other cases he and his project was working on.  Like the McMillian case, most of the cases involve people who were possibly wrongfully accused or convicted, those who were mentally disabled, and those whose defense had been ineffective (for various reasons, but usually, per Stevenson, because the defendant did not have enough money to pay for effective counsel).  He also spends a solid chapter discussing his efforts to prevent juveniles from being sentenced to life in prison (“death in prison” as he calls it) and from being dealt with by the adult criminal justice system.  The McMillian case also had a racial element to it, which is likely unsurprising since it happened in Alabama in the early 1980s.  After a girl was murdered and the local police couldn’t identify a culprit, they found a convenient suspect in McMillian, a black man who was known in some circles to have had an affair with a white woman.  For most whites in the South in the early 1980s, that was still culturally unacceptable.  Eventually, McMillian was convicted on very shaky testimony and put on death row.  When Stevenson got around to working his case (“got around” since Stevenson took it upon himself to look into just about every death row case), he found many legal holes and worked tirelessly to overturn the conviction.  It took years, but he eventually succeeded, overcoming general police incompetence, racist feelings, and legal precedent, something that is always hard to deal with in the American justice system.  Stevenson notes, in his conclusion to the book, that as he’s worked these cases, he’s learned about justice and mercy.  It’s not just the people in prisons (there rightfully or wrongfully) that are, in some way, “broken,” but that we all are, and that when we recognize that, we are more prepared to show mercy to the broken around us.

The book is informative and really makes the reader think (two important qualities in books).  Crime and the criminal justice system are an interesting topic to learn about, even if one has never really been involved (the closest I’ve ever been is explaining to a judge that the 90 m.p.h. I was accused of driving was patently false, although I would freely admit to driving 75 m.p.h. in a 65-m.p.h. zone; he believed me, thankfully, and the fine I had to pay was quartered).  McMillian’s story is quite gripping, and the book is well worth a read.  Some of the other stories Stevenson brings up are also interesting, but given the lack of detail and attention paid to them, they waver between being a decent supporting cast and being a distraction.  The points made in the supporting stories about the struggles those with mental incapacities have in getting a fair trial are well worth exploring, but need a more extensive treatment.  Arguably the largest point made by the book is that poor people are often hung out to dry when it comes to adequate representation in court.  Stevenson’s book does not make public defenders look good at all.  They are repeatedly shown to be petty and lazy.  My guess is that is an unfair characterization of all of them, although there is no reason to doubt his description in the specific cases he mentions.  Another subject brought up is rehabilitation for those who get out of prison, which seems like a pretty universal thing people should be able to rally around.  In discussing legal questions, it’s always worth hearing the other side, and this book doesn’t do that.  There is no discussion of how, in cases with mentally competent adults, by simply not committing crimes (or, in cases where things aren’t legal crimes, but are against God’s commandments), the majority of these situations could be avoided.  I also found it somewhat disingenuous to have a lawyer talking about applying the law fairly since it is unscrupulous lawyers (Stevenson seems to be an honest one) who use legal tricks and loopholes to keep those who are actually guilty out of prison or free from other consequences.  The justice system, like anything done by the government, is a one-size-fits-all thing, so when too many people are seen getting off the hook, the pendulum swings the other way with minimal sentencing requirements and other harsh penalties.  Finally, racism is also brought up a couple times in the book, and in a few cases mentioned, it seems to have played a negative role, and there is no reason to not believe Stevenson’s account.  I am old enough to remember some people saying interracial relationships were to be avoided (by the time I was a teenager, this sentiment had either died out or was not something people chose to talk about, but in circles I ran in, I believe it to be the former and, certainly, those of my generation did not hold those views), so the McMillian story has a very real air about it.  At the very end of the book, Stevenson strayed into the world of social justice, but it seemed to be a small part of the message, and one I hope stays in the background because it pales in comparison to the message Stevenson, maybe unwittingly, presents, which is that individuals who are free to make their own decisions and who are willing to love their neighbor and sacrifice their time and efforts provide the greatest good.  There was a powerful story in the book where Stevenson helped a black guy who had a troubled childhood and then committed a violent crime.  During prison visits, Stevenson met a prison officer who was quite antagonistic toward Stevenson and, based on some of his tattoos and bumper stickers, harbored at least some racist beliefs.  Stevenson didn’t openly confront this man, and once the warden had to escort the prisoner to trial and heard about his troubled childhood in the foster care system, mellowed greatly, even getting the prisoner a favorite treat, likely against prison rules because the guard found something in common with the prisoner: a troubled childhood in dysfunctional foster homes (dysfunctional homes are a constant in the book, but not an issue that gets discussed).  I thought the story fit Stevenson’s message about all of us being broken in one way or another and our cognizance of that opening us to being more merciful toward others as powerful as anything in the book.  

   

This work, including all text, photographs, and other original work, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 License and is copyrighted © MMXIV John Pruess.

Next Stop Execution

If one spends very much time doing anything connected to Russia, the topic of spies will undoubtedly come up.  As one who was born before the Cold War had ended and as one who served a church mission in Russia, Russian spies are something I’ve often heard about.  On my mission, I served in the mission office for a while.  Missionaries who were serving in the city of Kaliningrad (I, sadly, have never been able to visit that intriguing place) once sent the office a copy of an editorial cartoon published in a local newspaper that depicted missionaries for our church asking local Russians about missiles.  Thanks to the Cold War, all Americans knew there was a vast intelligence complex in Russia, bent on suppressing dissent in Russia and recruiting spies abroad.  It seems that the American news has often dealt with the topic, too, thanks to traitors like Robert Hannsen and Edward Snowden or people that catch the media’s attention like Anna Chapman.  There have been a few Russians willing to help the West, though, even if we seem to not hear as much about them.

Next Stop Execution by Oleg Gordievsky is the account of one of those Russians.  The book is an autobiography or memoir, and takes the reader through Gordievsky’s life from his early childhood to his post-defection life in England.  He seemed to have a fairly normal childhood, although his father was somewhat enigmatic since his father worked for Stalin’s intelligence organ, the NKVD.  Gordievsky did well in school and happily joined up when the intelligence services came calling.  He enjoyed being pushed by his training and quickly assimilated to the system, including bureaucratic idiosyncrasies.  He had a talent for languages, and ended up being posted abroad, where he enjoyed life and started to get a taste for Western democracy.  Gordievsky chronicles his home life, including an unsatisfying first marriage and then a second marriage.  He explains how he had suspicions about inefficiencies in the Soviet system and outright lies about Communist doctrine early in his training since he had access to Western publications.  Those doubts didn’t lead to much until he saw the Berlin Wall go up and Czechoslovakia invaded.  After that, he decided to take action and responded positively to overtures from the British and Danish intelligence services.  Eventually, he would go on to spy for quite a while for the UK, before being outed.  He says he figured out on his own that something was about to go down since he was unexpectedly called back to Moscow from London, where he had been posted.  Gordievsky made the decision to get out of Russia then and there.  He left his wife and kids, surviving extended family, and homeland with the help of the UK via a harrowing ride to Finland.  That story includes all the stuff of movies, including being smuggled across borders in the trunk of a car.  Gordievsky’s life in the UK, he says, has been interesting, presenting information to many Western governments, but not without some sadness since his longtime separation from his second wife resulted in them splitting up.

The book was interesting and a good read.  I enjoyed reading about his childhood and schooling and probably could’ve handled more information about everyday life in the post-WWII Soviet Union.  Having lived in Russia as a missionary and having experienced everyday Russia, information expanding my views on that is always nice to have.  I enjoyed reading about some of his disdain for the processes his agencies made their employees go through.  As an American, I often participate in the time-honored tradition of complaining about bureaucracy, and it was good to see that Russians do the same.  The middle part of the book, about his work and home life, was maybe a little less interesting, and I thought a little on the egotistical side.  His philosophical evolution was interesting to read about, especially from the standpoint of current international relations.  He was intrigued by the West because of democracy and economic opportunity.  It is worth asking is we are doing all we can today to preserve those two ideals.  The final section of Gordievsky’s book, about being hunted by his own employer and his escape to freedom, was riveting, although, as mentioned above, a bit sad because of the need to leave his family behind.  That, too, though, is a lesson, not unique to this book, about the value of liberty and the need to sacrifice in order to have liberty.

This work, including all text, photographs, and other original work, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 License and is copyrighted © MMXIV John Pruess.

Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl

“ . . . liberty is more valuable than life.”

An unfortunate part of American history is that of slavery.  I’ve always been inspired by Founders who set up a system with an eye toward slavery’s elimination and then a president in Abraham Lincoln who was willing to stake both himself and the country on slavery’s elimination.  Every since I saw the movie Glory in junior high (they released an edited version especially for showing in schools), I’ve appreciated the blacks who risked it all and more to fight against slavery, both as soldiers and as abolitionists or runaways or simply doing what they could to sabotage the system, much as those in occupied territory might do in a war when there weren’t other options available to them.  There are many inspiring stories.

Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl by Harriet Jacobs, whose pen name was Linda Brent (available for free from Google Books) is an autobiographical account of Jacobs’ life from her time as a little girl to later in life when she is an adult with adult children of her own.  She describes her life and the life of those around her, like her parents, grandmother, and siblings.  The reader also learns about the immediate household of her owner.  As she works in the house, the reader does not learn much about the lives of slaves who worked in the fields on plantations.  While Jacobs herself undergoes very little physical abuse, she describes plenty that happened to family members and acquaintances.  She did, unfortunately, receive a lot of unwanted sexual advances from her master, which she notes was a very real experience for many, if not most, female slaves.  While it seems she avoided being raped, many others were not as fortunate.  Eventually, Jacobs has children by her own choice by another white man.  That causes some awkwardness, but what it really does is cement her desire to not be a slave anymore.  She realizes that, as slaves, her children have very little to look forward to.  With this in mind, she forms and executes a plan to run away.  She does this with a little help along the way by various friends and family and by avoiding capture by hiding in swamps, on boats, and, eventually, in the attic of her grandmother’s house.  She stays there, rarely coming out, for the next seven years.  This allowed her to see her children, who lived with her grandmother.  It also made for some close calls since her master was always hoping to re-capture her.  Eventually, she secured a way to the North and lived the rest of her life there, eventually being reunited with her two children.  Nothing was simple, though, and even getting her kids with her was difficult.  Life was made more difficult by the fugitive slave law, but Jacobs had a few extremely kind and understanding people in her life that helped her along at many dangerous turns.

The book was really interesting.  I thought it presented a lot of information about the life of slaves that maybe not everyone thinks about.  Jacobs talked a lot about how slave families were ripped apart.  She talked about the sexual abuse and harassment that was widespread in the South, yet often swept under the rug by what was considered to be polite society.  She talked about the role of religion in slaves’ lives; most were religious in spite of the gross hypocrisy displayed by the whites around them.  Like so many similar stories, Jacobs displayed an incredible resiliency and deep will to fight for what was right.  She and others risked their lives for freedom.  Her story is one that is well worth remembering because it so well demonstrates the value of freedom and how we need to protect it.

This work, including all text, photographs, and other original work, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 License and is copyrighted © MMXIV John Pruess.

13 Hours

Benghazi, a port city in Libya, was site to a terrorist attack on American diplomatic and intelligence facilities in 2012.  Ever since that event hit the news, it has been the subject of much speculation and no less than ten U.S. Congressional inquiries.  Like many other events in today’s hyper-politicized world, the attack and the response have been politicized by both the Left and the Right.  Africa isn’t usually on my radar (although, with China’s activities there, it probably should be more of a concern to more people), but like the story told in Black Hawk Down, there are occasionally stories set on that giant continent that grab my attention.  The politics surrounding the U.S. response to the attack have been a bore, but the story of the people on the ground has made me take notice.

13 Hours: The Inside Account of What Really Happened in Benghazi by Mitchell Zuckoff (ISBN: 978-1-4555-8229-7) tells that story from the perspective of the contract security officers, referred to as “operators” in the book.  This small team of men was assigned to provide security to the diplomats and analysts working out of the small diplomatic facilities in Benghazi.  The book gives us a little background on each of them and then jumps right in to the fateful day when two of them, the ambassador, and a government computer specialist would die.  The security officers all had military backgrounds.  They would put that to the test when the facilities they were hired to protect came under attack.  The diplomatic compound came under attack first and was, sadly, overrun before the security officers could do much.  It was there that the U.S. ambassador and one of the IT specialists lost their lives.  As told by the security team, that may have been preventable given a quicker or a more powerful response, had more U.S. assets been able to respond in a timely fashion.  They got their truest test a little later, when the annex where they lived came under fire.  They repulsed three separate attacks, but since the third attack included mortars, two of the contractors were killed.  All, though, fought bravely, as did some of the other government employees involved.  The story presented by the author, who worked directly with the surviving team members as he wrote the book, is lively, action-packed, and keeps its distance from anything political.  The security team is presented as a few guys who were there to do their job, and like hard-working Americans everywhere, worked extremely hard and sacrificed to get the job done.

Overall, I enjoyed the book.  As mentioned above, it’s fast paced and tells an interesting story.  I appreciated that it steered clear of politics.  This was the story of the security team.  It certainly had their opinions in it, and since they are all self-assured people, the opinions are strong, but they also come off as genuine people, real patriots, guys who were just trying to do their jobs.  These were dangerous, somewhat thankless jobs that most people are unwilling to take despite the good pay.  It was a quick read thanks to being drawn into the story and being able to feel oneself there with smoke in the air and bullets flying.  The security team was decorated, although not very much compared to some of the others even though they likely did more than the others, but did come across as pretty humble about that and the fact that they were just doing their job, a job they had signed up for because they believed in their country and its ideals.  I sensed some bitterness about their downed comrades and their perceived shackling when it came to just how they would’ve responded, but it didn’t bother me, probably because most people feel that way at one time or another about a supervisor or some regulations they have to deal with.  The reported dialogue was salty, as one would expect from career military and security men.  My feeling at the end, though, was that they should be held up as people worth emulating given their hard work, sacrifice, and patriotism.

This work, including all text, photographs, and other original work, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 License and is copyrighted © MMXIV John Pruess.

Clinton Cash

Bill Clinton was president for two terms from 1993 to 2001, so for more than one-third of what I think of as my youth.  Clinton’s presidency was seminal (both definitions 1 and 4), and I got to watch a lot of it unfold.  Clinton’s time as president was filled with scandal, whether it be his affair with Monica Lewinsky, the Watergate real estate scandal, campaign finance controversy involving the Lincoln Bedroom, or allegations of sexual misconduct in his past.  Like Romania’s Communist dictator being overthrown, I got to watch as President Clinton was impeached.  It was interesting to watch the country split along the line of which side one was on regarding the impeachment.  As I watched, I detected a certain level of hypocrisy coming from the American Left and the media, who told Americans that much of Clinton’s conduct did not affect the job he was doing as president (which may have been true), but were then adamant that Republican politicians accused of similar or even lesser crimes resign, be impeached, or be prosecuted in court.  This approach to the way politicians conduct themselves in America changed the political landscape because the Right has often decided that fighting fire with fire has been more effective than rolling over.

Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich by Peter Schweizer (ISBN: 978-0-06-265943-9) talks more about Bill and Hillary Clinton after the Clinton presidency than during it, but the story told would not have been possible if it weren’t for Bill Clinton having held America’s highest office first.  After leaving office after eight years, the Clintons decided to stay intimately involved in politics.  Hillary was elected to the Senate, ran for president, and was secretary of state under Obama.  In the book, Schweizer chronicles how the Clintons leveraged their proximity to power to rake in piles and piles of money.  The author points out that there is nothing technically wrong about that fact.  What was so suspicious was the timing, amount, and source of much of that money.  The book carefully points out the machinations that often took place under the radar.  When certain shady businessmen wanted to get involved in the Kazakh mining business, big donations were made to the Clintons’ foundation, Bill made a high-profile visit to Kazakhstan, said some stuff that, in some ways, legitimized Kazakhstan’s dictator, and suddenly those same businessmen had a deal.  When Russia wanted in on buying American uranium and Hillary sat on a Senate committee that was involved in the approval of that plan, those involved in the deal were donating to the Clintons.  Similar actions took place when India wanted to get nuclear technology.  The Clintons had shadowy dealings in South America and in Africa.  When the Clintons were in a position to possibly affect the outcome of a decision, they and their friends seemed to benefit and America seemed to lose.  Schweizer ends his book with an appeal to those who have the legal authority to investigate these suspicious dealings.

I found the book a very interesting read.  There were times when it seemed a little heavy on dollar amounts and obscure names (people described as things like “mining royalties expert[s]” are quoted in the book), but the picture painted was fascinating.  Politicians around the world of every political persuasion engage in this type of behavior.  This is not unique to the Clintons, so it was neat to see these types of concrete examples and see how power and position can be bought and how little one’s word seems to mean to many if they can achieve power or riches.  Given the track record established by Bill while in the White House, none of the things here seemed particularly surprising, but the in-depth nature of the book added to the gravity of the seriousness of what is going on.  I was also reminded that no matter how many rules, laws, regulations, and agreements are made to fight corruption in politics, if someone’s willing to pay the right price, there’s a politician ready to wheel and deal.  The book is as much an indictment of the Clintons as it is a call to everyday citizens to vote out career politicians and take their countries back.

This work, including all text, photographs, and other original work, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 License and is copyrighted © MMXIV John Pruess.

In Europe’s Shadow

As a kid, I knew little about Romania.  It was connected to the famous book Dracula, which I read in high school for English sophomore year and was left unimpressed.  During the 1980s, Romanian gymnast Nadia Comenici was all the rage when the Olympics were discussed.  I was born too late to see her groundbreaking performances in 1976.  Romania was part of the Soviet bloc, so I knew it was a Communist country and an enemy to the United States, but I felt no threat from the Romanians, unlike the Soviet Russians.  In 1989, the Communist world came tumbling down, and Romania was part of that world-changing spate of events.  I very clearly remember watching on TV as Romanians take to the street waving their flag with the Communist symbol cut out of the middle, leaving a large hole.  I had to be pulled away from the TV to go to a family Christmas party.  Even as a young boy, I realized I was witnessing history in the making.

In Europe’s Shadow: Two Cold Wars and a Thirty-year Journey through Romania and Beyond by Robert D. Kaplan (ISBN: 978-0-8129-8662-4) is a wide-ranging survey of Romanian history, focusing on the post-World War I XX century and the first decade or so of the XXI century.  Kaplan has written and traveled widely, but is somewhat of a Romanian expert.  He writes history as a travelogue, which provides an interesting narrative as he explains the history behind what is happening in modern-day Romania.  Romania’s history, long intertwined with that of the European empires and the Ottoman Empire, plays a large role in what is happening today, especially because, according to Kaplan and many of the people he interviews, the same players are in the game.  The European empires have been replaced by the European Union and Putin’s Russia.  Romanians seem to recognize that they are still a borderland between these powerful entities.  This is especially true because of Romania’s neighbors, Moldova, a place where there is a greater Russian influence and which is home to one of the many frozen conflicts in the post-Soviet sphere, and Ukraine, which recently became the latest casualty of Russia’s desire to keep things as unstable as possible on its periphery.  Kaplan paints (and “paints” is the right word as he is a masterful writer, helping the reader see themselves there with him in dingy Communist hotels or on bright, lively Central European town squares) a picture of a Romania that has progressed a long way since the exciting fall of Communism in 1989, but still recognizes that there is room for further improvement.  Kaplan’s Romania leans strongly to the West, but knows its past and is wary of the East, home to Russia, which is altogether too happy to meddle in Romanian affairs.

Although I had read Kaplan’s Balkan Ghosts, I didn’t realize he was such a Romaniaphile.  The Romnia-centric material in the book made it a little dry in places, but I found myself coming back to it again and again because I found it incredibly relevant to the current events of 2020, both in the U.S. and on the international stage.  Early in the book, it was about the American experience and Kaplan’s defense of the individual.  He had seen, up close and personal, how Communism destroys the individual in favor of a mass thinking alike.  There is not room for dissent.  As a borderland, Romania has long had struggles of an ethnic nature, and while that seems to be far from the case now, the lessons are worth learning: stifle the individual, enhance the groupthinking mass, and ethnic tension is almost a given.  I also found his commentary on global culture reducing the importance of everything to be accurate.  Finally, his take on Russia was brilliant: Putin seeks instability.  Where this is instability and shadiness, Putin thrives, usually at the expense of the West.  I have long posited that Russian foreign policy was simple: instability.  He noted that although Russia used military power in Georgia and Ukraine, its political use of energy and great willingness to meddle in elections and politics made it a much greater threat, especially because those methods of fighting are harder to deal with in open, democratic societies.  The book was well written and interesting, but one that is likely more appreciated by those interested in Romania first of all and Eastern Europe and Russia second.

This work, including all text, photographs, and other original work, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 License and is copyrighted © MMXIV John Pruess.

Outrage, Inc.

When I was a kid, I was big into conservationism.  I thought re-using things and recycling things was pretty cool.  We had a guy on our street that worked for Reynolds Aluminum Recycling Company (as I remember it, anyway; I could be wrong), and I remember driving with my dad to a semi trailer set up in a parking lot in Layton to drop off a bag of old aluminum cans and get a few dollars in return.  It seemed like a pretty cool thing to a kid.  I watched National Geographic specials about the ozone hole with interest and once even got a book from those Scholastic catalogs they always send around in schools about things kids could do to save the planet and stave off the impending ice age.

Outrage, Inc.: How the Liberal Mob Ruined Science, Journalism, and Hollywood by Derek Hunter (ISBN: 978-0-06-283552-9) talks about that very ice age and how it never came, but the same alarmism that drove the talk about it has not abated at all.  In fact, according to Hunter, the hype about the ice age’s replacement cause, climate change, is exponentially greater and has been combined with overwrought hype about dozens of other issues.  The thesis of Hunter’s work is that that hype is lacking a foundation in reality, but has overtaken all of pop culture, a lot of the news media, and a lot of the scientific world.  He talks a lot about the Leftist bias in all of those areas that the Right so often complains about.  In each section, he provides concrete examples and then some analysis to drive home the points being made.  He digs into some things that many readers probably would not even consider on their own, such as the budgets (and sources of those same budgets) for various movies.  He found that while the movie studios and producers make their mainstream fare, they also unabashedly spend millions on agenda-driven movies that usually don’t do well at the box office.  An agenda-driven press, though, happily covers those films in great detail.  Hunter discusses the origins of some of pop culture’s environmentalist stars like Bill Nye and Neil deGrasse Tyson and why they are really only qualified to speak about certain issues, but seem to be asked for what are portrayed as authoritative statements on a variety of things.  Hunter notes that if people can be incited to anger, they do what all people do when angry: make less-effective decisions, including asking for government policy that limits liberty and voting in politicians that want to expand government control.

The book was an interesting read.  The bias argument is an old one that is not always easily provable either way.  Hunter’s myriad examples were welcome additions to this argument.  The strong connection he made between the ineffectiveness of emotion-driven decision making and the push in the media to keep people worked up about something was well made.  In the last few years, the Right in America has started paying more attention to pop culture than in the past, and they are right to do so if they want to make inroads there.  Hunter’s analysis explains why this is so key.  While I appreciated so many concrete examples of movies, newspapers, and other works that bolstered the points Hunter was making, I was disappointed that the book was so laid-back in tone and even had a few of the lame jokes that both political sides make about the other.  Leaving that out and using the same pages and ink for a few more solid examples of Hollywood spending, editorial bias, or pseudo-science would have improved the book markedly and made it applicable to a wider audience.

This work, including all text, photographs, and other original work, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 License and is copyrighted © MMXIV John Pruess.

Church of Cowards

I grew up in a religious family with parents and grandparents who were examples of hard work, service, dedication, and faith.  A lot of what they did was within the framework of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.  As a young teenager, I remember when my dad gave a talk in church (almost every Sunday, two or three people from the congregation give talks — sermons, essentially — that they have prepared ahead of time, by invitation).  I don’t remember the particular subject, but it involved God’s command to love and serve our fellowmen.  As people were milling about after church, I overheard one person commenting on how my dad was certainly entitled to give a talk on that subject because he walked the walk, as they say.  I don’t know if I was meant to hear that comment, and I’ll never know, but I did, and it taught me a lesson.  In later life, I have spent a lot of time and effort trying to convince both myself and others that the message of the gospel of Jesus Christ is one of action.  He expects us to be active instruments in His hands, seeking out others and lifting them up.

Church of Cowards: A Wake-up Call to Complacent Christians by Matt Walsh (ISBN: 978-1-62157-920-5) is a book about that very call to action.  In the book, Walsh discusses some of what he perceives to be problems in America and then talks about how they are largely, if not completely, overcome by Christians getting up and putting their religious beliefs into action.  While he is Catholic (not discussed in the book, but a known fact), the book is not directed at any specific denomination; the things he says are meant to be applicable by all believers.  He notes that polls generally find America to be about 70% Christian, but that America does not function like a country that is 70% Christian.  The opening chapter presents a fictionalized situation where barbarians come to America to slaughter Christians, something like ancient Rome, but can’t find anyone that will stand up for what the barbarians believe to be Christianity.  The people they find are wishy-washy and non-committal about anything other than their openness and tolerance.  The rest of the book that looks deeper into those watered-down values and how far they are from what Walsh believes is taught in the Bible.  Modern man’s disdain for organized religion, the commitment many show to entertainment instead of God, and a brand of religion that doesn’t require any sacrifice from its adherents are a few of the topics that draw Walsh’s ire in a, typical for his Internet-based daily show, scathing take-down of modern American Christianity.  The book asks those who call themselves Christian to start taking their religion more seriously, which, for most, will mean making effort to change and become more active.

I wasn’t sure what to expect from this book.  Podcasting doesn’t always equate to writing, so even though the author has a successful show, that doesn’t mean he’ll write a book successfully.  It probably helps that he also writes a regular column that tackles similar subject matter.  American culture is always in Walsh’s crosshairs, and the writing was not a disappointment.  I was also interested to see how religious writing from a conservative Catholic would square with the theology of my own church.  In general, it did, and the doctrinal differences expressed in the book were not central to his arguments, so I didn’t think they detracted from the points made and believe that would be true for most any denomination.  As with anything that touches touchy subjects, I didn’t agree with every word (he brilliantly took on Christian entertainment in a section with which I couldn’t agree more, though), but there was much where I was nodding in agreement and there was no arguing on the main point: America would be a vastly different country today were we who profess Christianity to actually live by its precepts in all facets of our lives.  The book is a call to action; it’s action that usually starts with ourselves.  Are we living our lives in accordance with God’s will or are we seeking our own?  The book serves, as its subtitle claims, as a great wake-up call.

This work, including all text, photographs, and other original work, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 License and is copyrighted © MMXIV John Pruess.

Irena’s Children

As a kid, World War II fascinated me, but that was mostly because of the aircraft.  I was not drawn as strongly to tanks, ships, or even the history, although I had a grandfather who fought with the U.S. Army in the Pacific and two grandparents who lived through the war as children in Germany.  It was the airplanes that held my attention as a kid, and I drew, painted, and read about them a lot.  I don’t remember exactly when, but sometime during my elementary school years, an exhibit on Anne Frank came to Salt Lake City, and I had the chance to see it.  That opened a whole new world to me: one of the resistance and the underground, a world where people had to risk their lives simply to do what was right.  That seemed very interesting to me then and has continued to be very interesting throughout my life.

It seems there are many stories to be told about those who did what they could to fight against the Nazis from inside, and Irena’s Children: The Extraordinary Story of the Woman Who Saved 2,500 Children from the Warsaw Ghetto by Tilar J. Mazzeo (ISBN: 978-1-4767-7851-8) tells quite an incredible story.  The book chronicles the World War II experience of Irena Sendler, a Polish Catholic who repeatedly risked her life to save Jewish children from the Holocaust.  Over the course of the war, Irena Sendler was able to aid in the escape of at least 2,500 (while she and others did their best to keep records, most of those records were ultimately lost and their reconstruction was admittedly incomplete) Jewish children from the Warsaw ghetto and into ethnically Polish homes and orphanges, where they were usually able to escape detection.  It was rarely a simple process, and included the stuff of thrillers and spy movies: escapes through the sewers, disguise, assumed identities, forged documents, illegal networks, and contacts in high places.  Irena didn’t do the work on her own (something she was always very quick to point out), and around her there was a large network of people that included teenagers that were willing to serve as sewer guides, nurses and doctors who helped with false papers, social welfare workers (Irena’s profession) who used their contacts and access to help, friends, and scores of people along the way such as neighbors and business owners that turned their heads the other way when they needed to, even if they couldn’t do more.  At one point, Irena was arrested and tortured by the Gestapo, and then she was the one being rescued.  The story is full of adventure and danger.  The author also spent a fair amount of time discussing Irena’s love life an seemed to make a lot of effort to fill the reader in on those who played the largest roles in Irena’s network of anti-Nazi collaborators.

The book was definitely an interesting one and told, as the tag line on the cover says, a “story of courage.”  What was particularly impressive (as is often the case with such stories), was that it didn’t seem that Irena had to summon much courage to do what she did, and neither did those around her.  They simply acted based on what they knew was the right thing to do.  Considering the millions of Jews killed during the Holocaust, the nagging question is always whether or not it was worth it.  Irena herself was scarred for life thanks to Gestapo torture.  She was more haunted, though, by the constant second-guessing that she did herself about whether or not she could’ve done more.  I am reminded of the story of a kid tossing drying star fish back into the ocean who is asked by someone else, “Why do you do this?  There are thousands of starfish on the beach; you can’t possibly help them all.” The response comes after throwing one more back in the water, “I made a differenc to that one.”  The book spent what I thought was too much time discussing Irena’s somewhat conflicted love life, including her love for one of the Jews she worked with in the underground (she divorced her first husband to marry her Jewish lover, Adam, then, divorced him, and after his death, remarried her first husband, so it was complicated, as they say), and I thought it often strayed from the story to provide too many details about those around Irena.  They were also couragous and worthy of having their stories told, but I would’ve appreciated a tighter focus, especially as the author seemed to enjoy noting at every possible chance that most of Irena’s circle (herself included), were socialists and came from somewhere on the left side of the political spectrum (mentioning this once would’ve been sufficient).  Given those criticisms, though, the story really was one of courageously making a difference and is a story well worth reading.  As a kid, it was easy to imagine myself in the resistance.  As an adult, I better understand those who struggled to make the right choices.  Stories like this are great because they inspire us to more easily make those correct choices and help others, even if we only make “a differenc to that one.”

This work, including all text, photographs, and other original work, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 License and is copyrighted © MMXIV John Pruess.

Kommando

Special forces, secret agents, elite soldiers and policemen, and others who have proven themselves as skilled, dedicated, and tough beyond the average person always make for interesting stories, both in real-life history and in fiction.  I am usually interested in such material, especially if it’s from actual wars and other events, although I did read the original Jason Bourne trilogy (admittedly, while on an exercise bike).  I have usually read from a U.S.-centric position and certainly from one focused on the West, both because that’s what interests me most, but also because that is what tends to be available to me (the victors write history, right?).

Kommando: German Special Forces of World War Two by James Lucas (ISBN: 0-304-35127-X) is a book that takes a look at special forces from the other side.  Lucas is clearly pro-Ally and writes from a perspective driven purely by scholarly interest.  The writing is dispassionate and appropriately covers the material.  He discusses German special forces in the army, navy, and air force during World War II.  He notes that German efforts in this area, just like happens to be the case for many other countries, historical and modern, were hampered by bureaucratic infighting, although this is probably a good thing in the case of World War II.  The book catalogues various battles and operations that German special forces were involved in, some successful, such as the taking of a large fortress, the Belgian Fort Eben-Emael, and others resulting in large losses for the Germans, such as an attempt at capturing Yugoslav Partisan leader Josip Tito.  There were also descriptions of guerilla action and more political things, such as an operation in Poland, where the intent of the operation was to make it look like the Poles were revolting, harming Germans, and giving Germany a reason to attack.  There were descriptions of the German Navy trying to conduct special operations in specially designed boats and submarines, most of which were abject failures.  The air force didn’t fare much better, although the author places much of the blame for this on German military leadership, including Hitler, who expected too much and did not use the special forces in appropriate situations.  Finally, the book examines non-military forces, which were special only in the sense that they weren’t regular soldiers.  In general, using civilians was even more havoc-filled than the failed operations that involved professional soldiers.

I am, by no means, a military historian, so this was an interesting book, although it faded toward the end as it catalogued the various failures of the German navy and Luftwaffe to conduct special operations.  Maybe that is another reason I’ve read so much about American and other Allied successes?  Victory and success probably make for better stories.  It was interesting to learn about a new subject, but it was a little dry once it got outside the major successes.  I, like the author, found that something ultimately to be grateful for, as that meant that Germany likely had the tools at its disposal to be successful using special operations in the war, but often didn’t because of management and other problems, which was a boon to the Allies.

This work, including all text, photographs, and other original work, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 License and is copyrighted © MMXIV John Pruess.

Savage Continent

My high school offered a number of Advanced Placement® classes.  I availed myself of the opportunity of taking some of them, but European History was not one of them.  It seemed too far removed from anything involving me, too obscure.  Since then, thanks to things like serving a mission for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Russia and my wife being from Europe, as well as a greater appreciation for my family history, which has a lot of Europe in it, I’ve developed a greater interest in Europe and European history.  The AP class typically starts with events in the XIV century, and my interests don’t usually go back that far, as the XX century and today are usually what intrigue me, likely because I see the connection, just like I didn’t see the connection back in high school.

Savage Continent: Europe in the Aftermath of World War II by Keith Lowe (ISBN: 978-1-250-03356-7) takes a very raw look at the immediate post-World War II period in European history.  The author catalogues the side of post-war Europe that is not usually highlighted in articles and books: genocide, ethnic cleansing, corruption, and violence.  The wartime years are famous for those, but they continued, usually on a smaller scale and in a more isolated fashion, for years after the Allies defeated the Axis powers.  Lowe examines the post-war conditions and how they created the ideal setting for further violence.  While the Allied armies tried to gain control and figure out just what they had on their hands, displaced persons and refugees wandered Europe.  There were plenty of instances of vigilante justice and people looking for revenge against the Germans or other people that had truly or only purportedly wronged others.  In Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, and a few other places, the German concentration camps were still being used, either has temporary housing or by the Soviets or others for their original purposes, just against a new type of inmate.  Ukrainian and Poles fought.  Greece went into a civil war.  Jews continued to find no quarter.  The Allies and international organizations worked hard to remedy the harsh conditions, but given the level of destruction the war had wrought, it was often slow going.  Finally, the emerging struggle of the Cold War meant that some of these problems were not given the focus that some would have liked them to have been under.

The book was a very interesting read, although it is easily one of those that is often described as “hard” because of the vivid descriptions of man’s cruelty to his fellowman.  The descriptions of the trials and judgements (or lack thereof) against Nazi sympathizers and collaborators in many European countries was interesting and presented interesting arguments on why they were conducted in the manner that they ultimately were.  I thought a lot of the content was new to me in that I didn’t know about this or that specific situation, but none of it surprised me, having spent time in and trying to learn about the Balkans.  It seems that a lot of the areas where post-war conflagrations happened are the same areas that are still thought of as potential flashpoints today.  People should be aware of the history and the potential consequences of various actions in these places.  I thought the book was somewhat anti-victor (both Western and Communist), laying blame for some of the post-war atrocities at the feet of the Allies.  I wasn’t convinced that was accurate or appropriate, but the book was interesting and provided a good view into a part of European history that is not often discussed.

This work, including all text, photographs, and other original work, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 License and is copyrighted © MMXIV John Pruess.

Dave Barry’s Money Secrets

Reading the newspaper was an institution of my childhood.  My parents always subscribed to the Deseret News, one of Utah’s two major papers.  I remember seeing my mom and my dad read the paper.  When I was really young, my interaction with the newspaper was limited to asking my parents to “read me the ‘Circle,’” which is what I called the Family Circus, since it was the only comic published in a circle instead of squares or rectangles.  Later on, I started to read the newspaper for myself.  I found it fascinating and read articles and columns from all the sections, but admit that the comics and the sports were the priorities.  Sunday’s massive paper with extra sections and tons of advertising inserts also featured Dave Barry’s nationally syndicated column, and I usually thought they were amazing.

Dave Barry’s Money Secrets: Like: Why Is There a Giant Eyeball on the Dollar? (ISBN: 1-4000-4758-7) is a parody of financial advice books or self-help books and contains a lot of Barry’s goofball humor as well as the kinds of juxtapositions of what people are always saying and what actually happens in real life that have kept comedians in business since the dawn of time.  He talks about the need for money, the lack of money, the history of money, investment opportunities, financial gurus, famous rich people (the bit on Donald Trump was surprisingly germane), tipping, and the stock market, among other things.  None of it is sound financial advice, but it the vast majority of it hits home, like all good humor, because there’s some truth to it.

With the demise of newspapers, I haven’t read Dave Barry in close to twenty years, so the book was a fun read.  I had never read a book by Barry, so this was also a new experience.  As always, I enjoyed the most of the humor.  I made the mistake of reading it on an airplane and I unsuccessfully stifled a few laughs out loud.  I think the book format was just maybe a little too much for me.  The column once a week was probably more the portion size I prefer.  I also thought there was more gutter humor in the book than I remember in the columns (unsurprising, given that I was reading the columns over twenty years ago, when standards were a little different, especially in the newspaper industry as opposed to the book industry).

This work, including all text, photographs, and other original work, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 License and is copyrighted © MMXIV John Pruess.

Master and Commander

Life at sea has captured people’s imaginations since the beginning of time judging by the number of novels written about seafarers.  Shipwrecks, battles, pirates, and journeys to exotic locales make for good stories, both when it’s history and when it comes in the form of a novel or a movie.  I read stories like Treasure Island and Carry On, Mr. Bowditch.  It was a world I was not really familiar with, coming from a land-locked state, but with the danger, discovery, and adventure, it was great reading.  In my teenage years, I saw the movie White Squall, which was a bit of a coming-of-age story, but the adventure of the sea and hard-knock learning made for a great story.  I also enjoyed the movie Master and Commander, which I saw in my early 20s.  I didn’t know that last movie was based on a set of rather well-known novels.

Master and Commander by Patrick O’Brian (ISBN: 0-393-30705-0) is the first in what turned out to be a twenty-book series.  The novel starts off with the main protagonist, Jack Aubrey, being promoted and taking the helm of his own ship.  He finds a guy named Stephen Maturin to be the ship’s surgeon, and off the two main characters in the series go, sailing for the Royal Navy.  Their first duty is convoy escort, but having successfully completed that, they are given permission to cruise, looking for prizes (enemy ships, as the setting for the books is the Napoleonic Wars).  Aubrey leads his crew to a few successes, some minor, some much more significant.  Throughout, life aboard a ship and life in port are presented in life-like detail, right down to the ropes and pulleys aboard the ship.  While Aubrey and Maturin headline the action, the story includes the other officers and men aboard, giving a complete picture.  The story is loosely based on some actual events in the Royal Navy’s history.  When the crew is in port, one is also introduced into Captain Harte, Aubrey’s superior, and Harte’s wife, with whom Aubrey is having an affair.  That comes back to bite Aubrey toward the end of the novel, when he is prevented from getting any of his prize money, which is Harte’s way of getting back at him.

The book was an interesting novel.  I’d have to watch the movie again to compare it to the book (although the movie is based on the first three books in the series).  It was a bit technical at times, but it really fit into the story since the sailors had to explain things to Maturin, who was a landman.  The explanations helped non-sailors like myself, but I often found myself lost in discussions of ropes and sails.  The action scenes were good, though.  I liked the realistic nature of the story, too, which applied to life on land, at sea, and in all the various professions encountered.  It seemed that O’Brian knew his stuff.  Overall, I liked it enough that I’m interested in finding the second book.  I was surprised in a couple instances by language sailors are famous for since I didn’t think those words were usually printed in stuff mass marketed in the 1970s.

This work, including all text, photographs, and other original work, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 License and is copyrighted © MMXIV John Pruess.

Flashpoints

In the end, the problem of Europe is the same problem that haunted its greatest moment, the Enlightenment.  It is the Faustian spirit, the desire to possess everything even at cost of their souls.  Today their desire is to possess everything at no cost.  They want permanent peace and prosperity.  They want to retain their national sovereignty, but they do not want these sovereign states to fully exercise their sovereignty.  They want to be one people, but they do not want to share each other’s fate.  They want to speak their own language, but they don’t believe that these will be a bar to complete mutual understanding.  They want to triumph, but they don’t want to risk. They want to be completely secure, but they don’t wish to defend themselves.

Europe has always been a hotbed of military activity.  I never really understood that in the 1700s and 1800s because so many of the nobility were related.  Even as World War I approached, the situation was much the same, and the leaders England, Germany, Russia, and others were all related in one way or another.  I would think that would’ve kept things calmer, but it didn’t.  Obviously, World War I and World War II followed the pattern of violence.  From then on, though, Europe has been relatively stable or, at least, the famous parts that people want to visit have been.  Always lurking under the surface, especially during the Cold War, though, was the threat of war.  It makes for interesting study and reading.

In Flashpoints: The Emerging Crisis in Europe by George Friedman (ISBN: 978-0-307-95113-7), the author examines the history of Europe between the great wars and then wants to know if Europe will continue in its post-World War II ways or return to its long history of war.  He argues that Europe’s history of conflict has not come to an end.  The war in Bosnia & Herzegovina after Yugoslavia disintegrated and Russia’s invasions of Georgia and Ukraine are given as the most prominent examples of how Europe has not been very peaceful since the fall of the Soviet Union, and that’s relatively recent.  He discusses many of the problems Europe is facing, such as immigration from predominantly Muslim societies, the UK’s distance from the EU (the book was written before Brexit was finalized), friction between northern Europe and southeastern Europe, and economic concerns throughout the European Union.  Friedman bases a lot of his analysis on what he calls borderlands, which are areas where cultures, nations, and ethnic groups meet and mingle.  People grow up speaking three or four languages and are involved in cross-border trade, but always seem to maintain some sort of identity, be it religious, ethnic, or national.  When conditions get worse, such as when the economy takes a hit, these borderlands can turn into flashpoints that have the potential to turn into war (or a larger war if multiple flashpoints go off at the same time).  The book is predictive in nature, so only time will tell.

While already a few years old, the book seemed relevant to today’s Europe.  Bosnia & Herzegovina is still unsettled with the ethnic Serb entity, the Serb Republic, defiantly worked towards ever-greater autonomy.  Kosovo is still a major sore point for the Serbs.  The Greeks and Turks are always on edge with each other.  The Greeks and Macedonians continue to squabble over just who was there first and whether the name of a country can infer violent intentions.  The EU itself has a member in Cyprus that is home to a frozen conflict.  Other frozen conflicts on the European periphery like Nagorno-Karabakh and Russia’s incursion into Ukraine are keeping things warm.  The author placed a lot of weight on Germany’s economic domination of the EU and how other countries resent that (which is likely true — as the story goes, a few years ago, a German missionary for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Athens was beat up when some Greeks learned he was a German, and the Greeks were of the opinion that Germany had caused most, if not all, of their economic problems).  I continue to think Russia, immigration, and energy (all of which Friedman touched on) have the biggest potential to add a spark to the flashpoints.

This work, including all text, photographs, and other original work, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 License and is copyrighted © MMXIV John Pruess.

12 Strong

I remember when I learned about the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001, pretty well.  I was still a recently-returned missionary from Russia who was attending fall semester at Brigham Young University.  I don’t remember exactly if I was going into or out of a class, but I was near the Carl F. Eyring Science Center (ESC) and ran into a guy who had grown up near two where I lived, often in the same church ward.  He excitedly and agitatedly told me about a plane having flown into the World Trade Center.  That was a very perplexing bit of news, but I think I was more puzzled by the interaction itself since this particular person had never been very fond of me.  It must’ve been pretty serious news to have someone who usually avoided me tell me about something.  I don’t remember how the next couple hours went, but, eventually, classes were cancelled, and most students, including myself, went back to our apartments to watch the news unfold.  

12 Strong: The Declassified True Story of the Horse Soldiers by Doug Stanton (ISBN: 978-1-5011-7995-2) tells the story of the earliest American soldiers to go into Afghanistan after the attacks that rocked America. The book starts with the airplanes flying into the World Trade Center and the reactions of the Army Special Forces soldiers who would eventually be the first to respond.  The reader learns quite a bit about the lives of the twelve guys to go into Afghanistan.  There were a variety of backgrounds, but all were  committed to serving their country and making sure the terrorists didn’t strike again.  The book tells of their preparations, some of which were rather unorthodox, including buying things from local stores or ordering supplies from catalogs.  Actually getting into Afghanistan was a complicated matter, even with bases nearby in Uzbekistan.  The helicopter rides from Uzbekistan to Afghanistan were harrowing experiences with pilots flying blind in unfamiliar territory with unfamiliar weather patterns.  They eventually made it, though, and then the soldiers got to doing what they were trained to do.  It wasn’t just fighting, though, as they were also trained to adapt to local conditions and get in the heads of the people they would be fighting with and against.  They had to make allies out of temperamental Afghan warlords.  The book portrays this as happening fairly easily and quickly, which may have been the case, but the men expressed a lot of trepidation about how their interactions with the Afghan leaders would go and were grateful for the American firepower that backed up what they were claiming they’d be able to help with.  The initial American soldiers were careful to remain in their advisory roles and let the Afghans run the war.  This also built respect and trust, and was a key to both building alliances and successful military action.  The special forces soldiers were convinced that their work in Afghanistan was so successful because it was really the Afghans’ fight against the Taliban — America was just helping.  One subplot, if it can be called that, in the book is the story of John Walker Lindh, the American who joined the Taliban.  He was a prisoner that some of the soldiers in the book came in contact with.  The book closes with happy reunions for the soldiers after completing their tour of duty, but then some must turn around and go to Iraq.  They answered the call of duty, but most did not see the war in Iraq in the same light as that in Afghanistan, and it ended in the loss of life for some of them.  They didn’t see the same system in Iraq, where the Americans were simply advisors and the suppliers of firepower, and that bode badly, according to them.

The book was a very interesting one.  I did not know a lot of what I read.  It was incredible to read of the combining of cutting-edge technology leading bombs to their targets using lasers and GPS and soldiers leading charges on horses, the Afghans often wearing threadbare clothes and makeshift shoes.  It was inspiring, really, to read of the Afghans who were fighting for their liberty.  They didn’t want any part of the oppressive Taliban regime.  On the other hand, it was depressing to read because of the way the situation in Afghanistan has regressed since these twelve soldiers finished their time in that far-away land.  I highly doubt that they nor their Afghan counterparts would say the fight was in vain.  They were fighting for what all people want — freedom and liberty.  The story of Lindh was one that didn’t really interest me.  I would’ve rather heard more about the military missions, strikes, and battles.  Lindh’s involvement seemed rather tangential.  I liked the stories of the Americans interacting with the Afghans, trying to respect their traditions, but also needing to get their job done.  There was a little bit of tension in those moments, which made for good stories.  The common human thread of a desire for liberty and a willingness to help one’s fellowman achieve that liberty was a powerful message.  Like all such war story books, it was probably a little front heavy, with a lot of information about preparations that took place before actually going into battle, and then short on details about the actual battles.  Finally, like most of these books, it was heavy on swearing.

This work, including all text, photographs, and other original work, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 License and is copyrighted © MMXIV John Pruess.